Showing posts with label California. Show all posts
Showing posts with label California. Show all posts
Wednesday, May 18, 2011
Wednesday, May 4, 2011
Calif AG Kamala Harris argues against Prop 8 Supporters defending the Marriage Ban
Kamala ain't playing with the Prop 8 supporters. She filed a brief stating that the opponents should not have the right to defend their foolishness in court.
Here's more:
In it, she argued that only public officials exercising the executive power of government have authority to represent the state when laws passed by voters or the Legislature are challenged.I greatly appreciate Kamala's firm stance on this issue. I'm glad she is fighting for us.
“California law affords an initiative’s proponents no right to defend the validity of a successful initiative measure based only on their role in launching an initiative process,” Harris wrote.
***
Harris contended in her brief that rather than empowering citizens, granting the sponsors of initiatives the ability to overrule the governor and attorney general’s judgment “would rob the electors of power by taking the executive power from elected officials and placing it instead in the hands of a few highly motivated but politically unaccountable individuals.”
source
Thursday, April 28, 2011
Court set to hear Prop 8 Supporters concerns over Judge Walker's Ruling
This is ridic, but I guess everyone deserves their day in court. On June 13, a hearing has been scheduled to see if Judge Walker's ruling should be tossed out because the he's is gay and in a relationship.
Chief U.S. District Judge James Ware said Wednesday he was fast-tracking the motion involving his retired predecessor, former Chief Judge Vaughn Walker.Basically, the haters think Walker was being unfair. Interesting, considering that they are being bigots about all of this. That's unfair.
Lawyers for the sponsors of the voter-approved ban asked Ware to vacate Walker's August 2010 decision overturning the ban as a violation of gay Californians' civil rights.
Backers of Proposition 8 said Walker should have recused himself or disclosed his relationship status before trial to avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest.
The judge, who left the bench at the end of February, recently revealed that he has been in a relationship with the same man for 10 years, but said he never considered removing himself from the case.
source
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


